Jatrol Premium

The Jatrol price indicator is calculated using inputs of related oil prices such as:

  • Crude Palm oil
  • Jet Fuel Price (IATA Indicator)
  • Rapeseed oil, Soy Bean oil
  • Crude oil

The base price calculated from the step above is then fine tuned using an index. The index is created using:

  • Nasdaq Clean Energy Index
  • Diesel (wholesale – ULSD future)

Jatrol Light

The Jatrol Light price indicator is calculated using
inputs of related oil prices such as:

  • Crude Palm oil
  • Rapeseed oil
  • Soy Bean oil
  • Crude oil

The base price calculated from the step above is then fine tuned using an index. The index is created using:

  • Nasdaq Clean Energy Index
  • Heating oil ETF (US)
  • Electricity (from 2 sources)
  • Goldman Sachs Commodity Index ETF
  • Certified Emission Reductions
  • European Union Allowances
  • Button Company Updates
  • Button News Archiv

Latest News

  • news/04-03-2012

    Jatropha BioJet showcase Costa Ricamore...
  • news/02-03-2012

    EU carbon price could double this yearmore...
  • news/01-03-2012

    Fedex CEO declares aviation biofuels a prioritymore...
  • news/01-03-2012

    Jet Fuel jumps 267% between 2000 and Q2 of 2011more...
  • news/01-03-2012

    UK starts to issue free carbon permits to airlinesmore...
  • news/01-03-2012

    HK Airlines may cancel A380 order over EU emission plansmore...
  • news/29-02-2012

    China targets 12 million tonnes of aviation biofuels by 2020, representing 30 per cent of total jet fuel usemore...
  • news/29-02-2012

    China bets big on aviation biofuelsmore...
  • news/29-02-2012

    Jatropha to solve Yemen food and oil crisismore...
  • news/28-02-2012

    EU Parliamentary committee agrees to cut supply of carbon permitsmore...
  • news/28-02-2012

    EU will respond to any airline carbon retaliationmore...
  • news/27-02-2012

    NYT: Airlines, Emissions and Europe’s Sensible Planmore...
  • news/27-02-2012

    US biofuel policy bans Indonesian and Malaysian palm oilmore...
  • news/24-02-2012

    EU airline retreat would cut 2 euros from EUA price: SocGenmore...
  • news/23-02-2012

    China's airline CO2 costs greatly overstatedmore...
  • news/23-02-2012

    “Coalition of the unwilling” falls short of a coordinated attack against EU ETSmore...
  • news/21-02-2012

    Beijing's stance on airline emissions stinks of hypocrisymore...
  • news/21-02-2012

    Global Market for Biofuels to Reach $185.3 Billion by 2021more...
  • news/21-02-2012

    EU's emissions trading move poses threat to growth of China's aviation sectormore...
  • news/21-02-2012

    Governments meet in Moscow to debate action against the EU’s inclusion of their airlines in carbon schememore...
  • news/20-02-2012

    Weak carbon price sees market analysts downgrading forecasts of EU ETS cost to airlines in 2012more...
  • news/16-02-2012

    Airbus urges EU to scrap biodiesel incentives for road transportmore...
  • news/15-02-2012

    Jatropha oil-based aviation biofuels cost-competitive by 2018, finds Bloomberg studymore...
  • news/14-02-2012

    Airlines to save up to 150 mln euros through EU offset concessionmore...
  • news/14-02-2012

    Airlines set to win carbon credits from biofuel flightsmore...

CORPORATE VIDEO

MEDIA LINKS

bfm_logo

11 December 2011
U.S. Pays $400 a Gallon for Gasoline in Afghanistan

Over the past six years of war, the expense of delivering fuel to America’s fighting machine in remote parts of Afghanistan has increased 50-fold.

It now costs on average of $400 a gallon to keep planes, tanks and other fuel-dependent machinery moving.

Captain Zack Albaugh, a California Air National Guard pilot who helps fly gasoline to rural bases, explained to The Wall Street Journal that the U.S. Air Force has to “burn a lot of gas to drop a lot of gas.”
The expense of trekking fuel to parts of Afghanistan has prompted the Department of Defense to consider alternative methods of energizing the armed forces, including the use of solar power, wind turbines and biofuels.

The sheer volume of air-dropped cargo is swiftly rising. In 2005, Air Force planes dropped around two million pounds of supplies to troops in Afghanistan. Last year, they delivered around 60 million pounds by airdrop. By the end of this year, officials say, they expect to drop around 90 million pounds of food, water, ammunition and fuel to bases in the country.
Air Force Gen. Raymond Johns, who heads the service's Air Mobility Command, said the December 2009 surge in U.S. troops has made resupply more challenging, particularly because of the threat of roadside bombs.
“They [troops] are in places where getting them their supplies is very risky to go by land conveyance,” he said. “So they've become more and more dependent on our airdrop.”
This particular launch was successful: a total of 36 bundles reached the drop zone.
But two parachutes did not fully open, and pallets stacked with barrels of fuel slammed into the ground, lost or badly damaged—“burned in,” as crews say.
“That's the cost of doing business,” said Lt. Col. Bill Willson, the squadron's commander.
A single airdrop represents the tail end of a complex supply chain. The U.S. military has multiple routes to keep supplies delivered to landlocked Afghanistan, and had been working to reduce dependence on supply routes that go through Pakistan before last month border closing.
Besides air drops and Pakistani delivery routes, the U.S. military can transport cargo overland through a road and rail network called the Northern Distribution Network, which brings non-lethal supplies in through Central Asia.
But some supplies—certain kinds of weaponry or other sensitive cargo—must be moved by air.
And that means Air Force planes will keep burning more fuel, and their crews will keep flying long hours.
“If you want us to drop something on a postage stamp, by God we'll do it,” said Maj. Richard Carter, a C-17 pilot, on a recent cargo flight to Afghanistan. “But there's only so many crews.”